Which HA MariaDB/MySQL Solution Should You Choose in 2026?
Comparison: Galera vs Async Replication vs Replication-Manager
High availability (HA) for MariaDB and MySQL databases has become a critical requirement for SaaS platforms, fintechs, e-commerce businesses, and high-traffic transactional applications. In 2026, basic replication is no longer enough: automatic failover, consistency, and operational simplicity are now baseline expectations.
Three main approaches dominate today:
- Galera (synchronous multi-master cluster)
- Classic asynchronous replication (master → slaves)
- Replication-Manager, a modern HA orchestrator built on top of MariaDB/MySQL replication
This detailed comparison helps you choose the right HA MariaDB/MySQL architecture based on performance, scalability, and reliability constraints.
1. Understanding Replication Models
Galera: Synchronous Multi-Master Replication
Galera Cluster relies on a virtually synchronous replication model. Each transaction must be validated by a quorum before being committed.
Key characteristics:
- Native multi-master
- Synchronous transaction validation
- Extremely sensitive to network latency
- Works best within a single datacenter
Advantages:
- Very strong consistency
- No replication lag
- Conceptually simple model
Limitations:
- Write performance impact
- Limited scalability
- Risk of cluster stalls
- Costly SST/IST on large datasets
Galera is best suited for homogeneous, low-latency environments with controlled write workloads.
Asynchronous Replication: Maximum Performance, Incomplete HA
Asynchronous replication is the historical foundation of MySQL and MariaDB. A single primary node handles writes and replicates events to replicas.
Key characteristics:
- Single primary
- Very high write performance
- Possible replication lag
- No native failover handling
Advantages:
- Excellent write performance
- Horizontal read scalability
- Works well across multi-AZ and hybrid setups
- Simple to deploy
Limitations:
- Risky manual failover
- Possible transaction loss
- Complex node re-integration
- Heavy reliance on custom scripts
Asynchronous replication is excellent for performance, but it is not a complete HA solution without orchestration.
Replication-Manager: Modern HA Orchestration
Replication-Manager is a high availability orchestrator designed to make MariaDB/MySQL replication reliable, automated, and production-ready at scale.
It adds a critical intelligence layer:
- fine-grained failure detection
- automatic failover in seconds
- GTID-based primary election
- fencing to prevent split-brain
- automatic node re-integration
- built-in SQL and replication monitoring
Replication-Manager turns native replication into a true enterprise-grade HA solution.
2. Performance and Consistency
Performance
Galera
- Writes slowed down by synchronous certification
- Efficient read distribution
- Rapid degradation as latency increases
Async Replication
- Maximum write performance
- Lag possible under heavy load
Replication-Manager
- Same write performance as async replication
- Lag verification before promotion
- Optional semi-sync support
👉 Performance winner: asynchronous replication orchestrated by Replication-Manager
Consistency and Durability
| Solution | Consistency |
|---|---|
| Galera | Very strong |
| Async only | Low to medium |
| Replication-Manager | High and controlled |
Replication-Manager ensures the most advanced node is promoted and prevents dangerous divergence.
3. Failover: The Decisive Factor
Galera
- No explicit failover
- Node failures can impact the whole cluster
- Complex network partition handling
Async Without Orchestration
- Manual failover
- High risk of promoting an outdated replica
- Significant downtime
Replication-Manager
- Fully automatic failover
- GTID-based election
- Anti double-master fencing
- Automatic re-integration
- Auditing and traceability
👉 This is where Replication-Manager clearly stands out.
4. Day-to-Day Operations and Maintenance
Galera
- Delicate configuration
- Risky operational procedures
- Heavy maintenance burden
Async Replication
- Easy to start
- Difficult to maintain cleanly over time
Replication-Manager
- Full automation
- Automatic replica rebuild
- Native monitoring
- Notifications and API
- Drastic reduction in human error
5. Scalability and Topologies
| Topology | Galera | Async | Replication-Manager |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-AZ | ❌ | ✔ | ✔✔ |
| Multi-region | ❌ | ✔ | ✔✔ |
| Hybrid | ❌ | ✔ | ✔✔ |
| On-prem | ✔ | ✔ | ✔✔ |
| Sovereign / Private | ✔ | ✔ | ✔✔ |
Replication-Manager is a solution truly adapted to modern distributed architectures.
6. Cost and Operational Risk
| Criterion | Galera | Async | RM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human cost | High | Medium | Low |
| Complexity | High | Medium | Low |
| Production risk | High | Medium | Very low |
Most HA incidents are caused by poorly handled failovers.
Replication-Manager automates precisely those high-risk areas.
7. Recommended Use Cases
Galera
- Single datacenter
- Extremely low latency
- Moderate write workload
- Real multi-master requirement
Async Replication Only
- Simple environments
- Absolute priority on performance
- Manual failover accepted
Replication-Manager
- Multi-tenant SaaS
- Fintech and e-commerce platforms
- Multi-AZ / hybrid / sovereign environments
- Reduced operational debt
- Replacement for MHA, Orchestrator or custom scripts
- Preparation for managed platforms such as Cloud18
Conclusion
In 2026, asynchronous replication remains the most performant foundation, but it is no longer sufficient on its own.
- Galera fits very specific scenarios.
- Async replication is essential for performance.
- Replication-Manager provides the missing layer: automation, consistency, and reliability.
It establishes itself as the modern reference for MariaDB/MySQL high availability, while laying the groundwork for next-generation managed platforms.
👉 Download Replication-Manager
👉 Schedule a MariaDB HA audit